Key Takeaways
- A Self-Managed (SM) package gives you more control and lower fees, but you take on most of the rostering and admin.
- A Fully-Coordinated (FC) package hands the day-to-day to a provider, easier, but typically with higher management fees.
- Self-management can save 10-20% of your annual budget if you're confident with admin and have strong family support.
- You can switch from SM to FC (or back) without losing your funding, most providers will help with the transition.
- If you're newly bereaved or under significant stress, fully-coordinated is usually the safer starting point.
When Australians sign up for Support at Home, the first big decision after choosing a provider is whether to run a Self-Managed package or a Fully-Coordinated one. The difference shapes how much you pay in management fees, how much admin lands on you (or your family), and how much control you have over which workers come into your home.
There is no universally right answer. The right answer depends on you. Here's the honest version of the trade-off.
What each model actually means
Fully-Coordinated (FC)
Your provider does almost everything for you. They:
- Recruit, employ, and pay support workers
- Build and adjust the weekly roster
- Manage replacement workers when someone is sick
- Process all invoices and statements
- Coordinate with allied health, nursing, GPs and pharmacies
- Provide a care coordinator as your single contact
In return, you pay a care management fee (capped at 10% of your quarterly budget under SAH) plus a package management fee (also capped at 10%). Most FC providers charge close to the cap on both.
Self-Managed (SM)
You take on far more of the operational running. You:
- Help select your own workers (sometimes still through the provider's pool, sometimes from a wider network)
- Build or approve your own roster
- Liaise directly with workers about times, tasks, and changes
- Approve invoices, often through an app or portal
- Take more responsibility for following up clinical referrals
In return, your care management fee is much lower, typically 0-5% rather than 10%. Package management fees still apply but are also often lower because the provider is doing less. Some SM providers charge a small flat monthly fee instead.
When self-management wins
Self-management works well when several things are true at once:
- You're confident with technology, most SM providers run their rostering through an app or web portal.
- You have strong family support, an adult child or partner who can help with admin.
- Your needs are stable, a steady weekly pattern of services rather than constantly changing.
- You enjoy being in control, some people find delegation frustrating.
- You're cost-conscious, the savings are real, often 10-20% of the annual budget.
A Classification 5 participant on a $40,212 budget can buy roughly 2 extra hours of personal care per week by going self-managed at lower fees. Over a year, that's 100+ extra hours of care.
When fully-coordinated wins
Full coordination is the better choice when any of the following apply:
- You're recently bereaved or seriously unwell, the cognitive load of self-management is real.
- Your needs are unpredictable, frequent hospital admissions, fluctuating health.
- You don't want admin in your relationships, some people don't want to be their support worker's de facto employer.
- You've never used home care before, start FC, learn how it works, then decide.
- You're geographically isolated, building your own roster in a regional area is hard.
The rule of thumb we use: if you're managing the rest of your life confidently, self-management is plausible. If you're not, don't take it on.
A side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | Self-Managed | Fully-Coordinated |
|---|---|---|
| Care management fee | 0-5% of budget | Up to 10% (capped) |
| Package management fee | 3-8% (varies) | Up to 10% (capped) |
| Roster control | You build it | Provider builds it |
| Worker selection | You shortlist | Provider assigns |
| Admin burden | Higher | Lower |
| Speed of changes | Faster | Slower |
| Continuity of staff | Often better | Variable |
| Best for stable needs | Yes | Yes |
| Best for complex needs | Sometimes | Usually |
| Best for first-time users | No | Yes |
What "self-managed" doesn't mean
Two important clarifications.
You're not your worker's employer. Even in a self-managed package, the support workers are typically employed by the provider or through a registered labour-hire arrangement. You're not running payroll, dealing with workers' compensation, or worrying about superannuation. The provider does that. You're directing the work, not employing the people.
You're not unsupervised. A self-managed SAH package still has a registered case manager attached. They check in periodically, review your care plan, and step in when something's gone wrong. You're not flying solo.
You can't simply hire any worker. Workers must still be police-checked, qualified to the relevant standard, and registered with your provider. You can't bring in a relative and pay them out of your package. (The exception is a tiny number of "consumer-employed" arrangements that operate under specific guidelines.)
The cost difference, made concrete
Take a Classification 6 participant on a $52,310 annual budget.
Provider X, Fully Coordinated:
- Care management: 10% = $5,231
- Package management: 10% = $5,231
- Available for services: $41,848
Provider Y, Self Managed:
- Care management: 3% = $1,569
- Package management: 5% = $2,616
- Available for services: $48,125
That's $6,277 more per year in actual service delivery. At an average $80/hr personal care rate, that's an extra 78 hours per year, about 1.5 hours per week.
Whether that extra 1.5 hours is worth the increased admin burden is the personal call only you can make.
The hybrid option
A growing number of providers now offer partially self-managed packages. The classic split:
- The provider handles rostering, replacement, and the support worker employment relationship.
- You handle approval of invoices, choice of allied health practitioners, and direct liaison with workers about specific tasks.
Care management fees in this model are typically 5-7%, midway between SM and FC. For families who want some control without the full admin load, this is often the sweet spot.
How to switch between models
You can move from SM to FC (or back) without losing funding or having to reapply. The mechanical steps:
- Talk to your provider's care coordinator. Most providers offer both models.
- Request a care plan review. They'll re-cost the package under the new model and walk you through the implications.
- Sign an updated service agreement. Should take less than 30 minutes.
- Allow 4-6 weeks for transition if you're moving from SM to FC, since rosters and worker assignments need to be rebuilt.
You should not be charged for the switch itself.
What to ask before signing
If you're considering self-management, ask the provider these questions specifically:
- "What percentage of your clients self-manage?" (Lower than 20% usually means the provider isn't really set up for it.)
- "What software do I use to approve invoices?"
- "Who do I call if a worker doesn't turn up?"
- "What happens when I go into hospital, does the package pause?"
- "How quickly can I add or remove a service?"
- "What's the exact breakdown of fees?"
If you're considering fully-coordinated, ask:
- "What's my care manager's caseload? How many other clients do they look after?"
- "How often does my care manager visit?"
- "Who's the backup if my care manager is on leave?"
- "What's the average response time for a roster change request?"
Don't optimise for the first week
A common mistake is to choose self-management because the early weeks of home care are quiet, only to be overwhelmed when needs ramp up. Most home care journeys involve more change than the first month suggests. If you're not certain you'll have the bandwidth in eighteen months, lean towards fully-coordinated and save self-management for later.
Compare both models in your area
The Home Care Prices comparison tool now lets you filter providers by whether they offer SM, FC, or both, and you can see the management fee breakdown for each. If self-management saves you the equivalent of two hours of care a week, the comparison is worth ten minutes of your time.